A number of post-Keynesian authors, called the neo-chartalists, have argued that the government does not face a budget constraint similar to that of households and that government with sovereign currencies run no risk of default, even with high debt-to-GDP ratio. This stands in contrast to countries in the eurozone, where the central bank does not normally purchase sovereign debt. While these claims now seem to be accepted by some economists, neo-chartalists have also made a number of controversial claims, including that the government spends simply by crediting a private-sector-bank account at the central bank; that the government does need to borrow to deficit-spend; and that taxes do not finance government expenditures. This paper shows that these surprising statements do have some logic, once one assumes the consolidation of the government sector and the central bank into a unique entity, the state. The paper further argues, however, that these paradoxical claims end up being counter-productive since consolidation is counter-factual.
from HAL : Dernières publications http://ift.tt/29uKfQv
Home » Sciences de l'ingénieur » [hal-01343744] The monetary and fiscal nexus of neo-chartalism: A friendly critique
samedi 9 juillet 2016
[hal-01343744] The monetary and fiscal nexus of neo-chartalism: A friendly critique
lainnya dari HAL : Dernières publications, Sciences de l'ingénieur
Ditulis Oleh : Unknown // 16:17
Kategori:
Sciences de l'ingénieur
Inscription à :
Publier les commentaires (Atom)
0 commentaires:
Enregistrer un commentaire